Letters to the Editor

Letter | Selective tolling a better answer for I-90 issues

This whole project appears to be cat fishing the public. The story in the Jan. 23, 2013, Mercer Island Reporter said the SR-520 project would cost $4.6 billion and that $4.1 billion could be expected from tolling SR-520 and that tolling of I-90 was to make up the difference. Other statements by WSDOT say that the shortfall is $1.4 billion. Something is wrong with your math, since 4.6 minus 4.1 is $500 million. Current SR-520 volume is 70 percent of previous levels, according to the same Mercer Island Reporter article.

The problem seems to be catching up with the Bellevue deadbeats (the missing 30 percent). Since you will know everybody’s address from camera views of license plates, it would seem simple enough just to bill Bellevue people and leave the rest of us alone. (After all, it’s Bellevue’s bridge, which they agreed to pay for.) I think that WSDOT is trying to pay for ferry boats, the Seattle waterfront project, mass transit extensions, and more without a vote of the people.

This is bigger than just beating on Mercer Island people. It will end a lot of business in Bellevue that comes from Seattle and Mercer Island, such as so-called fine dining.

The correct answer is selective tolling on I-90, not mass tolling of everyone in the country who uses I-90 to Seattle.

James E. Rice

 

Community Events, April 2014

Add an Event
We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Read the latest Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Apr 16 edition online now. Browse the archives.