Trust violated by past letter to the editor | EDITORIAL

Mercer Island Reporter unable to verify letter writer’s identity.

  • Tuesday, November 19, 2019 3:20pm
  • Opinion

Yes, we feel bamboozled.

We received a letter to the editor that was critical of a city council candidate. That letter ran in the Oct. 23, 2019, issue of the Mercer Island Reporter. It also was posted to our website. Later, concerns were brought up by readers that the letter might have been inauthentic. And that’s a problem.

When concerns were brought up, we attempted to contact the letter writer by phone through a valid phone number that was required to submit the letter. The letter writer did not respond to our request for contact. Because we could not further verify the letter writer, we removed the letter from our website.

Letters submitted through the website require a full name, phone number and address. As an unofficial letters process, if something about the letter or the required information raises flags or sounds alarm bells, we dig further. In this case, the address appeared to be valid, the name did not seem inauthentic and the phone number, too, didn’t raise any immediate concerns. The content of the letter was what it was, and that content did not appear to violate our letters policy.

Members of the community can corroborate that we’ve reached out with questions, clarifications and fact checking regarding past letters.

Frankly, we’re not convinced calling a phone number provided by an impostor would lead to anything more than repetition of the initial lies (if this is actually an impostor — we haven’t heard back from the letter writer).

That being said, certainly this event is a moment for reflection where we’ll step back and review our letters process and perhaps discuss if letters/guest opinions/or submitted content should continue to run in the Mercer Island Reporter moving forward. Our trust feels violated, your trust likely feels violated by proxy, and it’s an uncomfortable position to be in.

We’d like to not end up here again in the future.

[flipp]

More in Opinion

Prescription for a 2020 Vision | On Faith

A monthly column dealing in matters of faith.

Come for the conversation, stay for the friendships | Windows and Mirrors

Talk Time classes allow English language learners to practice their speaking and conversation skills.

Washington State Capitol Building in Olympia. File photo
Despite ruling on Public Records Act, we need to keep a close eye on Olympia

Washington Supreme Court upholds that state legislators are subject to the Public Records Act.

Helping neurodivergent students navigate higher education | Windows and Mirrors

The Neurodiversity Navigators program at Bellevue College offers various services to students who are on the autism spectrum.

When asked their opinion on contract talks, they were silent

A 2017 law lets lawmakers offer negotiation topics. But a bipartisan panel didn’t do so this week.

Changing systems doesn’t happen overnight | Windows and Mirrors

It’s been a year since the Menchie’s incident and here is what the city of Kirkland has been working on since then.

Discerning fact from opinion

It can be more difficult than people first think, according to the Pew Research Center.

Our newspapers have many reasons to be thankful

Changes have had positive impacts, readers offering support.

Trust violated by past letter to the editor | EDITORIAL

Mercer Island Reporter unable to verify letter writer’s identity.

From a place of respect | Windows and Mirrors

What does it mean to share your culture with others?

Letters to the editor, Oct. 23, 2019

Letters on the upcoming election.

Mental health: One size does not fit all | Windows and Mirrors

The challenges of providing mental health services for communities of color.